What New Disney World Resort Designs Are Getting Proper & Improper


At any time when new idea artwork for expansions is launched or a resort reimagining wraps up at Walt Disney World, followers are fast to criticize or complain, with a typical chorus being that Imagineering has misplaced its contact, the corporate now not cares about themed design, or the inns have gotten indistinguishable from Hiltons or Marriotts. This put up gives commentary in response, the extent to which we predict it’s proper and incorrect, and underlying causes of the shifting kinds at WDW resorts.

There’s no scarcity of examples that illustrate this exact situation enjoying out. The latest occasion got here with the announcement of the DVC cabins coming to Fort Wilderness. Plenty of Fort Fiends are understandably apprehensive about what Disney Trip Membership will do to the character and character of one of many final vestiges of the Trip Kingdom of the World.

Within the final decade-plus, loads of this criticism has revolved round DVC. Look no additional than my very own commentary to the announcement of Reflections – A Disney Lakeside Lodge. Mercifully, that undertaking has been placed on indefinite maintain, but it surely’s solely a matter of time earlier than that highly-desirable (and prepped) plot of land is revisited for future improvement.

Then there’s the new DVC tower at Disney’s Polynesian Village Resort, which we equally criticized and in comparison with one thing out of Vacation Inn’s exterior design portfolio. If something, I don’t suppose our commentary there was destructive sufficient, as that towering addition will irreparably alter the character and look of the Magic Kingdom monorail loop.

Then there’s Disney’s Riviera Resort. Our commentary at announcement, all through building, and even upon opening was crucial. Our Disney’s Riviera Resort Evaluate spills loads of digital ink lamenting the unambitious exterior design. Whereas I stand by all of that, I additionally should admit that the resort has grown on me significantly over the previous few years. The factor is, there’s lots to dislike–but in addition lots to like–about Disney’s Riviera Resort.

As you may discover, there’s a commonality amongst all the aforementioned initiatives: they’re all Disney Trip Membership. That’s correct, however I’d say the sample is extra precisely amongst expansions of current properties. (It simply so occurs that almost all of them are DVC, since that’s disproportionately what Disney builds now on the lodging facet.)

While you examine Walt Disney World resorts constructed earlier than the mid-Nineties to ones constructed or expanded upon in the previous few years, there’s typically a transparent division. The exteriors of present initiatives are sometimes interchangeable with actual world Vacation Inns or different mid-tier chained model inns.

Stroll round Crescent Lake and take a look at the facades of those resorts. They’re brimming with element, texture, ornamentation, allure and whimsy. The outside surfaces alone are a pointy distinction to the brand new on line casino tower at Coronado or the Fairfield Inn Des Moines Airport Riviera Resort. There merely is just not the identical depth of element within the designs with new builds at Walt Disney World. The exteriors are largely unthemed; at finest, they’re adorned with a minimal quantity of prospers to blunt their boxiness.

One rationalization for that is that Disney merely doesn’t wish to spend on themed structure, which eats into revenue margins on Disney Trip Membership gross sales. This is sensible, and in addition explains why Disney is including these towers alongside current resorts slightly than making them standalone properties. By constructing adjoining to present inns, they’ll share infrastructure or don’t want to supply each amenity on-site.

That is fully comprehensible, and there are additionally upsides for company in increasing at current resorts. I’m not solely unreasonable about improvement at Walt Disney World, I simply suppose it must be carried out in a sustainable method, and one which’s respectful of and in line with what already exists. That’s my large criticism of Gran Destino Tower, Disney’s Riviera Resort, Reflections Lakeside Lodge, or the upcoming Polynesian tower. All of these look nothing like their environment–they stick out like sore thumbs.

As a lot disdain as I’ve for the outside look of Gran Destino and the Riviera, it’s additionally solely applicable to level out that each are glorious resorts if all you care about is their substantive choices and examine them solely from the within, or in isolation. To be honest, that could be the case for a lot of followers and most informal customers and resort clientele.

The surface look of 4 Seasons Orlando isn’t precisely something particular, but it surely’s an important resort on the within. The crucial distinction is that 4 Seasons is understood for superlative service, not Disney design–and the 4 Seasons didn’t influence the present ‘skyline’ of Walt Disney World when constructed. (In reality, there are many world-class luxurious inns that are available completely boring and uninteresting packages. All-encompassing themed design is among the distinctions between these and Walt Disney World resorts.)

For all of my complaints about Disney’s Riviera Resort, the visitor rooms had been by no means amongst these. These visitor rooms do an important job of balancing competing pursuits, and are concurrently luxurious, fashionable, and themed. Reaching this trifecta is exceedingly troublesome, and an space the place Disney struggled pre-Riviera. The room reimaginings pre-2019 replicate this–the observe report is hit and miss, particularly with something carried out in 2014-2018.

Publish-Riviera, Walt Disney World has been principally crushing it with room reimaginings. (For me, the Modern is the lone exception to this–however some folks appear to like these rooms.) The present ‘wave’ of progressive lodging that marry space-saving kinds with well-themed ones is ideal. These supply an array of upgrades to each the shape and performance of the rooms, with little of worth misplaced within the course of.

Evaluate the brand new rooms at Boulder Ridge with these just a few years earlier at Copper Creek–the previous are far superior to the latter in each conceivable method. The distinction is much more stark if you look again on the final rooms on the BoardWalk or Seaside Membership Villas with the most recent ones. Grand Floridian is at the moment within the means of “undoing” its mid-tier Marriott fashion rooms and changing them with what we’d take into account a few of the finest rooms at Walt Disney World.

We’ve shared this sentiment in plenty of room critiques and picture excursions, and it’s all the time met with a mixture of fan settlement and disagreement. That’s comprehensible, as fashion is a matter of private desire and tastes, and there’s by no means going to be full consensus. Even with rooms we like, it’s potential to concede sure factors: some rooms look too sterile, flooring may be loud, there’s much less allure, and so forth. And naturally, the dearth of mattress runners–who cares how unsanitary they is perhaps!–actually makes the designs really feel incomplete.

Whereas conceding a few of that, it’s troublesome to not marvel the diploma to which nostalgia and sentimentality is clouding objectivity. We additionally very a lot “get” this, and have fondness and reminiscences round loads of little issues at Walt Disney World. I’m not going to provide examples that could possibly be used in opposition to me sooner or later, however I do know I’ve irrational ardour and love for sure issues at Walt Disney World which can be unpopular with present company.

The identical might most likely be stated for different followers and outdated room designs. I’m sorry, however the Nineties and 2000s kinds of so many resorts didn’t age effectively. A lot of these are loud, garish, and would (rightly) be criticized by informal company as trying like grandma’s visitor room. It’s potential to personally love them for the reminiscences they maintain and nonetheless admit that. Having the ability to acknowledge and maintain conflicting emotions is an effective ability.

Past that, there are additionally variations between the preferences of diehard Walt Disney World followers and informal company. Usually, these align–however positively not all the time. One straightforward instance is resort layouts. Many followers love the sprawling fashion of Port Orleans, Caribbean Seaside, or the Worth Resorts. (I’m certainly one of these “many followers.” There are few issues I get pleasure from greater than wandering, exploring, and absorbing ambiance. It truthfully saddens me that extra folks don’t admire this, as a result of this ‘blessing of dimension’ is so unusual at actual world inns.)

By and huge, common company hate this. It is among the commonest complaints about these resorts, and has negatively impacted satisfaction scores and the chance of revisiting or recommending a selected property. It’s not the one cause (see above about shared infrastructure prices), but it surely’s an enormous contributing consider Disney’s choice to consolidate Caribbean Seaside and Coronado Springs whereas including towers to their grounds. It’s additionally one large cause why I’d be stunned if Walt Disney World returns to the sprawling fashion of these resorts anytime quickly.

The identical is true in visitor rooms. Diehard Walt Disney World followers love thoroughly-themed rooms, with many favoring a ‘extra is extra’ stylistic philosophy. Many people wish to see transportive themes executed in intelligent methods; resorts that take us to a different time and place are beloved even when “missing” in-your-face characters from Moana or The Incredibles.

Against this, a majority of informal guests crave characters, comfort, and/or luxurious. They need the excessive costs of resort rooms to be obvious by way of recent designs and well-appointed lodging. To lots of them, “distinctly Disney” means mental property, not a transportive theme.

None of that is notably speculative or theoretical. These are the conclusions reached when evaluating responses to check room ideas and visitor suggestions. It ought to go with out saying, however these are generalizations and never definitive across-the-board. It’s additionally honest to level out that company can’t give suggestions on what they aren’t proven; you don’t know what you’re lacking out on in case you by no means see or expertise it. You don’t know what you don’t know!

That is additionally to not give Disney a move on every little thing, hand-waving away any lackluster designs as a result of “they have to be what company need!” I don’t imagine that for a second. There are many initiatives at Walt Disney World which have dangerous outcomes by virtually any cheap metric. No quantity of excuses or makes an attempt to elucidate that away move muster.

Take Carousel Espresso, the brand new eating location that changed the reward store within the foyer of BoardWalk Inn, for instance. Actually nobody requested for this fashion. There weren’t visitor satisfaction surveys suggesting that what folks actually need is the generic “fashion” of cookie-cutter large field inns. (Severely, that is nearly indistinguishable from the look of the lobbies on the new Flamingo Crossings prolonged keep inns.)

I don’t know what the reason is for Carousel Espresso, but it surely isn’t one. One chance is that it was a fast undertaking with minimal (or no) involvement from Imagineering. One other is that it had an extremely restricted finances, and never sufficient assets had been allotted to show this into something higher or extra formidable.

It’s additionally potential that there was meddling from non-creatives who don’t “get” what makes BoardWalk Inn particular, or what its theme even is. They may have checked out visitor suggestions in regards to the resort feeling dated, and drawn the faulty conclusion that this is the answer to fixing that and giving folks what they need. (It isn’t.)

Personally, my suspicion right here (with completely nothing to again this up) is that it’s all the above with the bungled consequence at Carousel Espresso. I simply don’t wish to reside in a world the place somebody–anybody–thought this design ought to’ve seen the sunshine of day at a Deluxe Resort themed to turn-of-the-century Atlantic Metropolis.

There’s additionally the potential for inventive failure. Many followers don’t wish to imagine this, and as a substitute blame the beancounters or no matter different boogeyman, however Imagineering is just not infallible. Not everybody at WDI has the identical expertise, and never all initiatives get assigned top-tier Imagineers. Even when assets have been correctly allotted, creatives have been chargeable for duds over time.

It’s troublesome to provide “pure” examples of this, as there’s often not a easy and simple rationalization. (Even with initiatives which can be well-done as a complete, there are misfires or cases of too few checks on the worst impulses of creatives.) With that stated, the undertaking that finest involves thoughts right here is the reimagining of Pixar Pier. Though this was a pet undertaking that bought pushed via, it was additionally a inventive failure with a ton of cash spent on what can finest be characterised as a lateral transfer. (I’d not be that charitable with it.)

With all of that stated, I additionally see too many hyper-critical fan responses to initiatives just like the inarguably-bad Carousel Espresso or the extra subjective room reimaginings. These reactions typically entail sweeping generalizations about how Walt Disney World doesn’t care anymore or do issues proper anymore, Imagineering doesn’t have the expertise to do “good” design anymore, amongst many different damning accusations. Fortunately, they’re additionally fully inaccurate.

I’ll be the primary to say that I feel there’s a problem with useful resource allocation at Walt Disney World. Sure initiatives price absurd quantities of cash, whereas different urgent points are outright ignored. That may be a actual concern, however one I’ll save for an additional put up and one other day. Regardless, the variety of formidable, profitable, big-budget, and inventive initiatives at Walt Disney World solely defeat these arguments. The good stuff raises the bar for every little thing else, and it additionally defeats the argument that Disney has misplaced its contact.

Heck, it’s potential to take a look at particular person parts of the identical undertaking and see outcomes of vastly completely different high quality. Since we’re speaking largely about design, instance right here is the brand new Disney Want. Though it’s a cruise ship, that’s kind of ‘resort-adjacent’ and there’s loads of overlap between the 2. Aboard the Disney Want, there are really beautiful areas; thematic exemplars that had been lovingly and expertly designed. There are additionally some actual headscratchers that really feel like they had been thrown collectively in quarter-hour whereas looking the clearance part of Wayfair.

After all, this additionally exists within the theme parks. If viewing every in isolation, would anybody imagine that Pandora and Dino-Rama are merchandise of the identical theme park, firm…and even universe?! (These two lands are Displays A and B within the case of “Not All the things Accomplished by Disney within the Nineties Was Good, and Not All the things within the 2010s Was Unhealthy.”)

To that time, it’s disingenuous to faux that every little thing from the previous was good and every little thing from the current is dangerous. The fanbase is extra related now, allotting quick scorching takes on every little thing–and sometimes, the extra sensational opinions are rewarded with probably the most attain. Again within the day, followers realized about new issues by way of books printed yearly or upon seeing or experiencing them firsthand once they visited the parks. (And I don’t learn about you, however I’m way more forgiving of issues in individual when ‘immersed within the magic’ than when sitting at my keyboard.)

Missteps had been mounted and course-corrections had been made with minimal fanfare. (Minus Dino-Rama, which continues to limp alongside for causes unknown–probably to torture me.) You possibly can scour YouTube or ‘extinct Disney’ pages and readily discover examples of issues from the Eighties and Nineties that might be completely eviscerated by the fandom in the event that they debuted as we speak. However once more, these shifting requirements and rose-colored glasses via which we view Disney’s previous are most likely higher addressed in a devoted put up.

In the end, that’s the place I come down on these arguments about resort reimaginings, redesigns, enlargement plans, and themed design traits on the resorts of Walt Disney World. This doesn’t come down strongly on both “facet” or include any definitive conclusions as a result of there aren’t any; it’s extra case-by-case, circumstantial, and sophisticated.

That results in rambling commentary like this, which most likely received’t fulfill anybody who has been a part of these seemingly infinite debates. Maybe I ought to’ve as a substitute devoted a pair thousand phrases to how the travesty that’s Carousel Espresso represents the inventive collapse of Walt Disney World (it doesn’t) or how the recently-reimagined resort rooms are nice and the haters have all of it incorrect (we’re not right here to stifle dissent; constructive criticism and suggestions about private preferences is all the time good!).

Ultimately, I feel it’s good to carry Walt Disney World to excessive requirements. It’s additionally honest to say that themed design and immersive environments are of paramount significance, and needs to be the calling card of Imagineering. Chasing modern design traits is a idiot’s errand, and one which’ll all the time lead to datedness. (Look no additional than all the “rustic hipsters transfer into an outdated barn and discover some eclectic decor on clearance at Anthropologie” interiors at Disney Springs that look drained lower than a decade later.)

Disney clearly have to be cognizant of visitor preferences and trade traits–particularly on the subject of consolation, comfort, and performance. Nevertheless, there are additionally good the explanation why Walt Disney World has developed such an ardent fan-following during the last 50+ years and Imagineering is a beloved establishment–however different companies producing cookie-cutter designs should not family names. Pushing the envelope and giving company issues they by no means knew they needed or wanted is a key to success, whereas settling for “ok” is a recipe for related responses from company.

Planning a Walt Disney World journey? Find out about inns on our Walt Disney World Motels Evaluations web page. For the place to eat, learn our Walt Disney World Restaurant Evaluations. To save cash on tickets or decide which sort to purchase, learn our Suggestions for Saving Cash on Walt Disney World Tickets put up. Our What to Pack for Disney Journeys put up takes a novel take a look at intelligent objects to take. For what to do and when to do it, our Walt Disney World Trip Guides will assist. For complete recommendation, the most effective place to start out is our Walt Disney World Journey Planning Information for every little thing it’s worthwhile to know!

Your Ideas

What do you consider current resort reimaginings, enlargement, and different design initiatives at Walt Disney World? Is there a clearly good or dangerous trajectory, or is it extra case-by-case with a mixture of excessive and low high quality outcomes? Every other ideas or suggestions so as to add? Do you agree or disagree with our evaluation? Any questions we can assist you reply? Listening to your suggestions—even if you disagree with us—is each attention-grabbing to us and useful to different readers, so please share your ideas beneath within the feedback!



Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles