Will Bob Iger Finish Investments in Disney World?

Throughout the Q&A of this week’s quarterly earnings name, CEO Bob Iger was requested concerning the firm’s “battle” with Florida and the way that would affect the way forward for Walt Disney World. This put up shares his response concerning the lawsuits, investments within the state, plus our commentary concerning the legitimacy of the risk.

It’s inconceivable to succinctly summarize what precipitated these feedback, because the saga has now stretched out over a yr, starting with Bob Chapek making feedback about Florida laws that even Iger concedes weren’t dealt with very effectively. That resulted within the state changing the Disney-controlled Reedy Creek Enchancment District (RCID) board, with one hand-picked by the governor. Previous to the brand new board taking management, Disney and RCID entered agreements that made nationwide information to be used of the “King Charles Clause.”

This handcuffed the brand new board, resulting in extra laws by the state to void the aforementioned agreements and extra. That has resulted in two lawsuits, one with Disney Suing DeSantis in federal court docket and one other with the governor-backed Central Florida Tourism Oversight District Board Suing Disney in state court docket. Earlier this week, the corporate amended its federal court docket grievance to incorporate new allegations pertaining to monorail rules and up to date interviews given by DeSantis. That kind of brings you in control, and units the stage for Iger’s newest feedback in the course of the investor name…

The prolonged block quote under is Disney CEO Bob Iger’s response to the query: “Florida is such a giant a part of the worth of the corporate, however you might have this political problem that solely appears to get extra press. It looks like you’re caught with this battle. So, how ought to buyers take into consideration the danger, each the near-term and long-term enterprise for Disney?”

The case that we filed final month made our place within the details very clear, and that’s actually that that is about one factor and one factor solely, and that’s retaliating towards us for taking a place about pending laws. We consider that in us taking that place, we’re merely exercising our proper to free speech.

Additionally, this isn’t about particular privileges or a stage taking part in subject or Disney in any means utilizing its leverage across the state of Florida. Since there’s been so much stated about particular districts and the association that we had, I wish to set the report straight on that, too. There are about 2,000 particular districts in Florida, and most had been established to foster funding and improvement. We had been a type of. It principally made it simpler for us and others to do enterprise in Florida. We constructed a enterprise that employs, as we’ve stated earlier than, over 75,000 folks, and attracts tens of thousands and thousands of individuals to the state.

Whereas it’s straightforward to say that the Reedy Creek particular district that was established for us over 50 years in the past benefited us, it’s deceptive to not additionally think about how a lot Disney benefited the state of Florida. Additionally, we’re not the one firm working a particular district. I discussed 2,000 others. The Daytona Speedway is one; so is the Villages, which is a distinguished retirement neighborhood. There are numerous others.

So, the purpose right here will not be leveling the taking part in subject. If the purpose is leveling the taking part in subject, then a uniform utility of the legislation or authorities oversight of particular districts must happen or be utilized to all particular districts. There’s additionally a false narrative that we’ve been combating to guard tax breaks as a part of this. However in reality, we’re the most important taxpayer in central Florida, paying over 1.1 billion in state and native taxes final yr alone. And we pay extra taxes, particularly, extra actual property taxes, because of that particular district.

There was no concerted effort to do something to dismantle what was as soon as referred to as the Reedy Creek particular district till we spoke out on laws. That is plainly a matter of retaliation whereas the remainder of the Florida particular districts proceed working principally as they had been. It’s additionally necessary for us to say our major purpose is at all times to have the ability to proceed to do precisely what we’ve been doing there, which is investing in Florida. We’re pleased with the tourism business that we created, and we wish to proceed delivering the very best expertise for company going ahead.

We by no means wished and definitely by no means anticipated to be within the place of getting to defend our enterprise pursuits in federal court docket, notably after having such a terrific relationship with the state as we’ve had for greater than 50 years. And as I discussed on our shareholder name, we’ve got an enormous alternative to proceed to put money into Florida. I famous that our plans had been to take a position 17 billion {dollars} over the subsequent 10 years, which is what the state ought to need us to do. We function responsibly.

We pay our fair proportion of taxes. We make use of 1000’s of individuals. And by the best way, we pay them above the minimal wage — considerably above the minimal wage dictated by the state of Florida. And we additionally present them with nice advantages and free training.

So, I’m going to complete what is clearly form of an extended reply by asking one query: does the state need us to take a position extra, make use of extra folks, and pay extra taxes, or not?

Earlier than turning to commentary, we frequently begin by providing the identical caveat to start every of those posts about Disney vs. DeSantis: don’t take something at face worth. That is extra about political posturing and theater than it’s something substantive. What the actors concerned say will not be essentially what they really consider.

I’d additionally warning towards drawing any untimely conclusions. Partly, this goes again to the ‘workforce sports activities’ nature of the standoff, and folks eager to consider their ‘facet’ is in the correct and can prevail ultimately. There have been tons of the twists and turns within the Reedy Creek saga up to now, and nobody has gotten this fully proper from the start. The one factor that’s predictable right here is unpredictability.

Commentary-wise, Iger’s framing of this once more struck me as savvy. Though this battle will likely be fought in courts of legislation, it’ll additionally be waged within the court docket of public opinion. Chapek did a really abysmal job of that. His fumbled response managed the exceptional feat of alienating folks on each side of the aisle. It was really a exceptional feat when you think about how polarized individuals are at the moment–and but, all of us kind of aligned towards Chapek. (Albeit for various causes.)

Quick-forward over a yr later. Chapek is gone, Iger is again, and the unique feedback giving rise to all of this are within the rearview mirror. As DeSantis has boasted, Disney has “not made a peep” about Florida laws or points for the reason that skirmish over a yr in the past. The one ongoing points contain the particular district and the way that’ll be ruled.

On the subject of public opinion, it’s honest to say that some minds are already made up, and nothing anybody says will sway them come what may. It’s virtually sure that applies to anybody studying this; you’re both personally invested on this or have adopted it intently. It’s additionally honest to say these within the pro-Disney “bubble” could underestimate simply how effectively that is taking part in with Republican major voters, with a clear majority supporting DeSantis on this battle towards Disney per polling from March and April.

That’s not everybody, although, and Iger’s reply here’s a savvy one. Spinning the state’s method as being anti-free speech, anti-business and anti-Florida is a sound technique to sway undecideds. It’s additionally sensible to immediately handle the particular district standing and taxes, as there are lots of misconceptions about each.

Lastly, Iger’s reply concluding with a query of his personal was masterful. This primarily places the ball in DeSantis’s court docket, who will now be requested by the media whether or not the battle is “value it for Florida” when at stake is $17 billion in investments, 13,000 new jobs at Disney, 1000’s of oblique jobs, and billions of {dollars} in tourism and tax income.

Even when framed that means, it’s arduous to think about DeSantis deescalating at this level. As an alternative, he’ll possible have a very good reply to Iger’s query, and one which’ll play effectively with the bottom. He’ll in all probability spin that as Disney making an attempt to “maintain Florida hostage,” an instance of Huge Enterprise making an attempt to steamroll the state or subvert the desire of voters, and once more reiterating that he’ll win over Disney. There’ll undoubtedly be extra to his reply–DeSantis will likely be prepped effectively for the query with a solution that hits the correct notes, simply as Iger was for the query on the investor name.

That’s a very good reminder that a lot of that is posturing. We normally provide the above preface about political theater because it pertains to Governor DeSantis and his presidential aspirations. Nonetheless, it additionally applies to the Disney facet of this standoff and Iger’s remarks.

DeSantis needs pink meat for the bottom; Iger needs DeSantis to again down. Since these two objectives are incompatible, and Iger’s overtures for a sit-down to deescalate have been rebuffed, his subsequent least-worst possibility is making an attempt to reframe DeSantis’s actions and statements in an anti-business means that’ll be dangerous to the state of Florida and its residents. That, too, is posturing.

Nonetheless, even earlier than Iger’s thinly-veiled risk to scale back investments at Walt Disney World, we had been listening to common reader questions on whether or not that will occur. Now, primarily based on Bob Iger’s simple assertion, it could seem that there’s a solution to that query.

Nonetheless, our reply continues to be the identical. It’s unlikely that the corporate will truly finish investments in Walt Disney World primarily based on the standoff with the state. Let’s break down why…

First, nobody wants a reminder that Disney is a enterprise. We’ve all had this strengthened time and time once more in the previous couple of years with the substitute of free FastPass with paid Lightning Lanes, proliferation of DVC, worth will increase, and elimination of Disney’s Magical Categorical. (I keep that final one was poor and shortsighted whilst a enterprise determination, however not the purpose of this put up!)

You’re additionally in all probability effectively conscious that Walt Disney World is the corporate’s money cow. This has additionally been strengthened time and time once more, most not too long ago on a number of consecutive earnings calls that mentioned record-revenue and per visitor spending up 40% of the parks & resorts phase, all whereas streaming companies misplaced about $1 billion per quarter as they sought to attain profitability by 2024, tentatively.

It also needs to go with out saying that the corporate doesn’t construct park expansions on a whim. As we level out with the discharge of each low cost, nothing is finished out of benevolence or at random. Simply as there’s a cause for releasing offers (enhance resort occupancy), there’s a cause for constructing new points of interest, lands, and so on. All of these initiatives are anticipated to supply a return on funding, prompting thousands and thousands extra folks to go to Walt Disney World–spending on souvenirs, park tickets, meals, resort stays, and extra.

That is mutually useful for Disney and Florida. The state collects tax {dollars}, and tourism to Walt Disney World have spillover results benefitting different companies in Central Florida and all through the state. The ‘Disney Bubble’ will not be really impermeable. That is exactly why the corporate and the state have had such a very good working relationship previously.

Whether or not the corporate invests in Walt Disney World hinges upon whether or not there’s a enterprise justification for doing so. If it is sensible they usually’ll see ROI to increase the prevailing parks and construct new points of interest, they may. If not, they gained’t. Identical because it’s at all times been, similar because it’ll at all times be.

If there was a plan a number of months in the past to take a position $17 billion over the subsequent decade at Walt Disney World, it’s very tough to see that altering primarily based on the latest lawsuits, laws, and public feedback. Possibly Iger was posturing then when teasing that funding, or maybe he’s posturing now by pretending to withhold it. However the firm can’t withhold investments out of spite–Iger isn’t Larry David. Doing so would arguably be a breach of its fiduciary duties to shareholders. In brief, that is virtually actually a hole risk.

The one means the corporate would pause or reevaluate funding is that if the most recent laws or public feedback have had a fabric antagonistic impact on Walt Disney World’s future efficiency potential or means to conduct enterprise within the state. Right here, it’s theoretically doable that the corporate views the brand new CFTOD board as an excessive amount of of a wildcard, or the potential for future draconian laws proscribing or regulating it as too nice.

My private opinion of the brand new CFTOD board will not be very excessive. As I’ve written repeatedly, they aren’t severe folks with honest motivations. Nonetheless, I additionally don’t suppose they’ve the capability or convictions to trigger a fabric antagonistic impact on Disney’s enterprise. I don’t suppose that’s the tip recreation, both. Once more, this all boils right down to political theater and presidential aspirations.

Past the unpredictability and uncertainty of this circus, the corporate would possibly contend there’s irreparable model injury attributable to the battle. That this has alienated a sure phase of its core viewers, which can now perpetually forsake its movies and theme parks. This has undoubtedly occurred to some extent, however in all probability not on any significant stage. It doesn’t matter what the chronically on-line would possibly suppose, most customers will not be that invested in tradition wars and gained’t deny their children rite-of-passage holidays over their grievances.

As for what is prone to occur, we’ve truly seen this story play out earlier than–and within the final decade. It didn’t garner nationwide headlines as a result of it wasn’t as provocative, however there was a somewhat-similar standoff with the Metropolis of Anaheim. After years of Disney-backed candidates prevailing in elections and supporting business-friendly proposals, the composition of the Metropolis Council modified.

Instantly, the corporate was receiving rather more resistance to its mission proposals and sentiment in direction of previously-approved improvement incentives soured. Consequently, the corporate cancelled an introduced resort and the Jap Gateway mission. It’s unquestionably true that improvement at Disneyland Resort was set again by a number of years a outcome.

Disney’s answer there was to work on repairing strained relations with the neighborhood, and likewise do all the pieces doable to see its most popular candidates prevail within the subsequent election. That’s additionally arguably what gave rise to DisneylandForward; in probably the most reductionist phrases doable, that proposal primarily seeks to do for the corporate what Reedy Creek did in Florida. (That’s a really imperfect comparability, however DisneylandForward will not be a substantive growth plan; it’s about autonomy for Disney to construct with out a lot pink tape.)

One thing comparable is prone to occur with improvement at Walt Disney World and in Florida. Simply as they needed to “wait out” a then-hostile Anaheim Metropolis Council till the subsequent election, the present standoff is presumably over when the Republican major ends or the pending litigation is determined, on the newest.

It’s doable that the corporate will enter a holding sample, hoping that the specter of lowering its funding “reminds” state leaders that the connection is mutually-advantageous. That doing so convinces everybody that it’s finest to drop the bluster and transfer on to some totally different tradition warfare. (It’s extremely uncertain that’ll work with DeSantis, but it surely might give statewide politicians pause. Do they wish to danger going through a Disney-funded opponent and having to reply questions on this within the subsequent Florida election? The calculus is totally different for these not operating for president.)

The most certainly end result is pausing improvement of the Imagineering Lake Nona Campus. The corporate is investing $864 million on that and it’ll carry 2,000 high-paying jobs to the state. This has already been delayed and should have hassle assembly its present goal date as-is. Formally hitting the brakes on that and leaving these jobs in California would sign that Disney is “severe” about its funding risk for Florida.

One other risk is that Walt Disney World delays future bulletins till this standoff ends. In Bob Iger Reveals Plan to Make investments $17 Billion on Walt Disney World Enlargement, we predicted that Animal Kingdom growth could be introduced on the Vacation spot D23 occasion this fall. If that is nonetheless a hot-button problem, I’d not anticipate that announcement to happen. On the contrary, I’d not anticipate any main bulletins for Walt Disney World whereas this battle brews.

To make an extended story quick, what’s most certainly to occur is delayed bulletins and timelines doubtlessly pushed again in consequence. (It’s additionally unlikely that something already below building goes to be paused. Tiana’s Bayou Journey, Moana’s Journey of Water, and all of the DVC additions will possible proceed as deliberate.)

Nonetheless, there are actual obstacles to the corporate commencing building at Walt Disney World within the near-term that transcend this. Particularly, Hulu and ESPN must be sorted out (purchased and/or offered), the streaming phase wants to achieve profitability or a minimum of stops hemorrhaging ~$1 billion per quarter, and a number of the firm’s debt needs to be paid down.

Some or all of these issues just about should occur earlier than significant CapEx could be spent on Walt Disney World. That alone places the begin of this work in late 2024 or 2025. So in brief, the standoff might affect the announcement timeline and would possibly delay some initiatives barely, however the greater obstacle to precise building is the entire above.

Admittedly, this all assume the perfect case situation with the standoff persevering with to play out largely in courtrooms. There’s at all times the likelihood that the battle might escalate or the connection between Walt Disney World and Florida might deteriorate additional. In case you informed me a yr in the past that Chapek’s hamfisted dealing with of this might snowball into Bob Iger and the state submitting competing lawsuits towards each other, that will’ve been a shock. (Not the Iger returning half–that’s the least stunning little bit of this all.) There have been so many twists and turns on this saga that it’s inconceivable to foretell the eventual end result. Nonetheless dangerous it might sound now, there’s at all times the potential for the state of affairs worsening.

Finally, about the one factor we can safely predict is that Walt Disney World will live on in Central Florida. The corporate will not be going to pack up its flagship theme park advanced and transfer to a different state–this isn’t Theme Park Tycoon. That may value tens (if not tons of) of billions of {dollars} that the corporate doesn’t have, and wouldn’t spend even when they did. The governors of California, Colorado, Georgia, South Carolina, and so on. don’t suppose they may, both.

As with a lot of this, that’s simply extra theatrics or political posturing. The corporate is taking part in the lengthy recreation with an eye fixed in direction of its long-term future in Florida. Walt Disney World will outlast Governor DeSantis and each statewide politician in Florida; if worst involves worst, they’ll work to get extra pleasant politicians elected. Wouldn’t be the primary time.

Planning a Walt Disney World journey? Study motels on our Walt Disney World Accommodations Opinions web page. For the place to eat, learn our Walt Disney World Restaurant Opinions. To save cash on tickets or decide which sort to purchase, learn our Ideas for Saving Cash on Walt Disney World Tickets put up. Our What to Pack for Disney Journeys put up takes a novel take a look at intelligent gadgets to take. For what to do and when to do it, our Walt Disney World Trip Guides will assist. For complete recommendation, the perfect place to start out is our Walt Disney World Journey Planning Information for all the pieces you want to know!


What’s your response to the most recent developments within the battle of Florida v. Disney? Assume Bob Iger hit the correct notes in the course of the earnings name, or do you agree with the governor’s method? Assume the corporate actually will withhold investments in Florida, or is that this a hole risk? Is that this one in every of this no-win conditions the place everybody loses the longer it’s drawn out? Maintain the feedback civil, and keep away from private assaults or perpetuating pointless tradition wars. Respectfully debating the change is completely wonderful, however don’t assault others or troll for controversy. That’s why Fb was invented.

Related Articles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles